I will not argue that there are cases of coercion associated with garment among Muslims. But by des

Hege Storhaug encouraged by his own little fan base consisting of online social losers who records and like racist comments. Storhaug have implemented organized liberty, and she uses the media to spread their extremist ideology.
In a rather "overconfident" motkommentar in Aftenposten trying Hege Storhaug this week to ascertain their extreme interpretation of Sharia Law as the right one. She does this without being able to ancient Arabic, no theological background and without religious affiliation to Islam. With its incorrectness legitimizes she extremist interpretation.
Storhaug maintains that "the hijab is Islamism uniform", ie symbol of totalitarian ideology. She writes that "Ashraf takes so wrong when he claims that women like Mother Theresa and Benazir Bhutto used the hijab. There is not a single photo on this planet who can attest to his claim. "
I will not argue that there are cases of coercion associated with garment among Muslims. But by designating hijab as fundamentalists' garments she tries to build acceptance for banning the hijab, which is none other than detention for a superior majority of women who use it voluntarily.
Then fit it bad that Storhaugship bedroom designs shall bright liberal values among mosques and religious leaders who have recently taken their position through participation in the demonstration against extremism. Individuals have the power to define
Storhaug refers to government grant and writer Walid al-Kubaisi as the source. Thus, she hijab's definition bedroom designs of power to an individual, who neither speaks on behalf of the world's Muslims, or represent them. At a single Muslim trying to assimilate, or is assigned rights over the power to define for residual values and actions are nothing more than the "Prophetic bedroom designs Ummah" does.
Storhaug, as a Norwegian, I want to go to a demonstration to take my distance from you. Your extremist thinking represents not Norwegian values, or the majority of Norwegians, no matter what network roles are saying to you. Sharia law is used in family cases
Women in society ruled by sharia usually have fewer rights than women in the West. The majority of Muslim communities have varying bedroom designs degrees of sharia integrated in their law codes, but almost all use sharia to manage family matters.
Many Muslim feminists and scholars argue quite rightly that the interpretations of sharia that continues to oppress women, has no basis in Islam, and is created by men's misinterpretation of the sacred texts. Religious texts are from another time
"I argue that Muslim bedroom designs family laws are products of socio-cultural conditions and legal arguments bedroom designs about the nature of the relationship between men and women. In other words, the legal structures created by men, shaped by social, cultural and political factors in Islamic sacred texts are understood and turned into law. "
Religious texts are from a time when the whole community context was of a different nature. Storhaug forget that even in the West (where Christianity has ruled largely) we had a women's liberation revolution over the past four to five decades. She can not force such a revolution in Muslim countries.
These are some of the prerequisites for taking to themselves and to respect democratic values. And in many of the Muslim countries, these assumptions have been deprived of them by the West's political warfare. For example, Al-Qaeda and Afghanistan's status as a direct result of US training to fight the Russians a few decades back. Mud Match with Storhaugship
Storhaug are welcome to twist their interpretation of Sharia laws in the direction of extremist context, but what is the difference between her and the extremists in "The Prophet's Ummah"? Then I must of course be allowed to twist my interpretation of her statements in neo-Nazi context, and we are both equally far in the mud fight.
Umar Ashraf